Lancet COVID-19 Vaccine Death Autopsy Study Censored!
Duh, the Results Don’t Support the Narrative so this is NOT Surprising!
A new pre-print study from the high impact journal The Lancet was posted on their pre-print server around July 5, 2023 and within 24 hours it was taken down. I wonder if we can all make a guess as to why this might have happened so quickly even when there were reports of record-breaking downloads of the paper.
Or maybe it’s not the money itself but blind belief in the trendy scientific dogma (ex. pharmaceutical vaccines and non-pharmaceutical pandemic measures) or fear of one’s career being ruined by the scientific establishment or public opinion if one doesn’t follow the narrative. Either way it’s happening.
Lucky enough I was able to get my hands of the full-text version of the paper before it was taken down. I’ll talk about the results shortly but first, it’s clear the peer-reviewed journals are not immune to censorship.
Dr. Peter McCullough is listed as an author on the study mentioned above, and he is no stranger to being vilified and censored across legacy and social medias, but he has also been censored from peer-review publication during the pandemic even though he was one of the most published doctors in his field prior to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Dr. McCullough and Jessica Rose (fellow Canadian eh!!!) had a paper pass peer-review, they paid for the publication fees, and it was formally published online. However, shortly after it was published, it was pulled off the site! The title was “A Report on Myocarditis Adverse Events in the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) in Association with COVID-19 Injectable Biological Products” and it was published in the Journal Current Problems in Cardiology.
Just reading that title, I wonder why it was pulled from publication just like the paper of today’s topic.
You can find a copy of the original paper and discussion of the entire censorship fiasco on Jessica Rose’s Substack.
On to the Next One
Here is the link for the most recently censored paper mentioned at the start of this article and this is what it currently states.
Using the Wayback Machine you can see it was posted July 5 and taken down by 2pm July 6, less than 24 hours after posting.
I am not sure how many scientific censorship situations like this have occurred during the pandemic, but I have added this as a topic to research and write about later. But for now, even having this happen to 2 papers is a complete subversion of what real science is supposed to be.
Now let’s talk about what the most recent study found.
Study Results
The title of the recently censored pre-print paper is “systematic review of autopsy findings in deaths after covid-19 vaccination”.
The authors identified 44 peer-reviewed studies that included autopsy and/or necropsy details for deaths of individuals connected to the COVID-19 vaccines. Out of those 44 studies there were 325 autopsy cases and 1 necropsy case. The information was then reviewed by 3 medical doctors (Roger Hodkinson, William Makis, and Peter A. McCollough).
The results are unfortunate, and as I keep saying, I wish we weren’t right about this from the start. Sadly, the physicians found that 73.9% of the cases were significantly linked to the vaccines, and in 62.5% of cases all 3 physicians agreed that the vaccine was the cause of death.
The most impacted organ system was cardiovascular, followed by hematological, respiratory, multiple organ systems, neurological, immunological, and gastrointestinal (Figure 2), with three or more organ systems affected in 21 cases. It was also noted that the majority of deaths occurred within 1 weeks after the most recent vaccination dose.
Ultimately,
The authors then suggest (with reference) that the underreporting factor for VAERS is 20. If you read my previous article, some researchers think the underreporting factor is closer to 40. Regardless, using 20, the total VAERS reported deaths in connection to COVID-19 vaccination is 35,324 x 20 = 706,480.
The Covidians and skeptics will say that VAERS reports don’t mean the vaccines caused the deaths, correlation doesn’t mean causation as we all know, but now we can apply the findings of this systemic review to the VAERS numbers.
The authors of this study were almost certain 62.5% of deaths correlated with COVID-19 vaccines were caused by the vaccine. So,
706,480 x 0.625 = 441,550!! Is that an acceptable number for anyone? Is the risk worth the cost of these vaccines?
The authors also found that 73.9% of deaths were significantly linked to the vaccines.
706,480 x 0.739 = 522,088!
There really aren’t many words left. This, plus, all the deaths caused by the non-pharmaceutical measures (lockdowns, school closures, business closures, etc.) equals a never-before-seen level of medical and public health failure!
The data from around the world is also clear, we are seeing excess deaths in highly vaccinated countries since the roll out of the vaccines. Data and evidence is becoming clearer each day, yet I continue to be flabbergasted, dumbfounded, and confused AF that this is not mainstream common knowledge and that our governments and health authorities are not aggressively investigating it.
Oh right, I forgot, it’s climate change, or cold weather, or exercising too much, or stressing over football games, or shoveling snow, or skipping breakfast, anything but the vaccines!
If you have been questioning whether we really were lied to and fed a constant stream of misinformation and disinformation propaganda from our governments, mainstream/legacy media, and health officials, now you have the answer. And they keep doing it!
I think/hope that more people are taking the blinders off and realizing what happened and is continuing to happen!
Remember the “if we can save just 1 life it’s all worth it” crowd? Where are they now?
For interested parties, the paper goes through a decent outline of research and data findings of possible COVID-19 vaccine mechanism of death and evidence of excess deaths occurring since vaccine roll out. I have copied some more parts of the paper below.