Pandemic of the Unvaccinated, Another Nail in the Coffin
Surprise! New study shows higher case, hospitalization, and death rates in the VACCINATED
I know I’ve said it a few times already but anyone on team reality, AKA team “actual” science, not team “the” science, knew a long time ago what the following study reveals. Team reality also predicted that this would be the predicament we would end up in if we mass vaccinated during high infectious pressure (ex. a pandemic) with a leaky vaccine.
Honestly, the time for I told you so is long passed. It’s time the covidian officials are laughed off the stage. Bye Bye. As my grandparents would say, don’t let the door hit ya where the good lord split ya. And as Jay would say
New Study Out of the UK
A pre-print study was just released on June 30, 2022 titled: “Increasing SARS-CoV2 cases, hospitalizations and deaths among the vaccinated elderly populations during the Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant surge in UK”.
The authors compiled data on cases, hospitalizations, and deaths by vaccination status using official UK databases including UK vaccine surveillance reports, UK technical briefings, National Health Services (NHS) database of COVID-19 hospital activity, and UK Office for National Statistics dataset. The study used traditional means of calculating vaccine effectiveness, not a test-negative design (more on this below).
Here are some of the study’s findings in the words of the authors themselves.
Note: there is a typo in the above. “September 12, 2022” should be 2021.
Remember, before the vaccines were granted emergency use authorization, the FDA specifically said 50% effectiveness was the cut off for even considering authorization. These results indicate that, even at best, during Omicron, vaccine effectiveness only reached 17.5%.
These findings aren’t that surprising for those that have been paying even the slightest bit of attention, but the following results are what many may be surprised at since our officials keep telling us the vaccines reduce COVID-19 severity.
You read it correctly, a higher rate of hospitalizations in the vaccinated.
You read it correctly again, a higher rate of death in the vaccinated also.
Again, this was known by team reality for quite some time and many countries, provinces, and states have stopped reporting case rates, and even hospitalization and death rates, in some places because it no longer supports their narrative.
For the visual learners out there, and I mean who doesn’t love a pretty graph. Here are the study results in graph form.
Cases:
Hospitalizations:
Deaths:
In other shocking, not shocking news, a peer-reviewed Israeli study published in April 2022, had similar findings, but of course it got no widespread attention.
The question then is, how can our government officials continue to tell us that the vaccines reduce severity of COVID-19? Are they outright lying to us? Most definitely some of them are lying to us, and this should be no surprise by now. But also, maybe the less competent of our officials are simply fooled by way of data interpretation.
Traditional vs Test-Negative Study Design
Test-negative study design is often used for vaccine efficacy studies because it’s a cheap way to recruit participants. Test-negative studies recruit participants who attend a healthcare facility and test positive for a particular disease; controls are patients undergoing the same tests for the same reasons at the same healthcare facility and who test negative. The design is often used for vaccine efficacy studies, but not exclusively, and has been posited as a separate type of study design, different from case-control studies because the controls are not sampled from a wider source population.
Aside from test-negative studies being cheaper for control group recruitment, it has also been suggested to reduce certain biases present in other study designs such as healthcare seeking behaviour. However, it seems that there is no formal justification for such a statement. Test-negative design may also yield incorrect inferences due to other forms of bias, such as collider bias, which does not impact cohort studies.
Additionally, test-negative design lacks generalizability to the population at large since its participants are people that have attended a healthcare facility due to symptoms. Selection in this manner does not allow for an estimate of the distribution of exposure in the general population.
Finally, there is concern about the calculations used in test-negative design. Westreich and Hudgens performed simulated study calculations and found that vaccine effectiveness was 61% in test-negative design vs 26% in traditional designs. These results show that test-negative designs may overstate vaccine effectiveness.
Is this why some “official” country, province, and/or state data shows vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 hospitalization and death while others do not?
This is just another of many examples of data massage and manipulation that has taken place over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Not to mention possible outright fraud.
But here’s the thing about TRUTH
Great work and info.
Seems to show about 4 studies now and counting, UK, Israel, Qatar and Sweden all showing the same truth.
The way of the liars is definitely rough and hard.
Please provide web links to the studies you are quoting.